Key Factors for the Increase of Scientific Production in Peru: Analysis of a Causal Approach and Computational Simulation

Main Article Content

José L. Segovia-Juárez
Cesar Osorio-Carrera

Abstract

Scientific production is crucial for a country’s economic and social development, advancing knowledge and innovation. In Peru, although it has grown in recent years, it still lags behind other Latin American countries. This article analyzes the key variables to increase scientific production in the country through an innovation system model that examines causal relationships and feedback between scientific production, technological development, and technology-based companies. Using a dynamic model based on the Forrester diagram and differential equations, a sensitivity and uncertainty study was conducted using Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) and partial correlation coefficients (PRCC). Peru’s population is growing due to a balance between births and deaths, but basic research investment is low, affecting the creation of technology-based companies. It is estimated that the number of researchers could exceed 33,000 by 2060. This work shows that to increase scientific production, it is necessary to increase the number of qualified personnel, properly employ this staff, increase their productivity, and implement mechanisms to prevent emigration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Segovia-Juárez, J. L., & Osorio-Carrera, C. (2024). Key Factors for the Increase of Scientific Production in Peru: Analysis of a Causal Approach and Computational Simulation. Revista De Investigación Hatun Yachay Wasi, 3(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.57107/hyw.v3i2.79
Section
Artículos

References

Aracil, J. (1995). Dinámica de sistemas. Editorial: ISDEFE. https://www.academia.utp.ac.pa/sites/default/files/docente/51/dinsist-dinamica_ sistemas.pdf.

Banerjee, S. (2016). Analysis of a planetary scale scientific collaboration dataset reveals novel patterns. In Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis, 85 - 90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45901-1_7.

Blower, S, & Dowlatabadi, H. (1994). Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of complex models of disease transmission: An HIV model, as an example. International Statistical Review, 62(2), 229 - 243. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403510.

Cabezas, C. (2014). Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud pública: Generando una cultura de publicación en el Perú. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2012.293.361.

Cohen, M., Alexander, G., Wyman, J., Fahrenwald, N., Porock, D., Wurzbach, M., et al. (2010). Scientific impact: Opportunity and necessity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 32(5), 578-590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945910365328.

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica [CONCYTEC]. (2024). Principales indicadores. https://portal.concytec.gob.pe/indicadores/principales/.

Gobierno de Argentina. (2023). Argentina se ubica entre los 10 países con más empresas de biotecnología del mundo. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/noticias/argentina-se-ubica-entre-los-10-paises-con-mas-empresas-de-biotecnologia-del-mundo.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática [INEI] (2023). Situación de la Población Peruana 2023: Una mirada hacia los jóvenes. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/inei/informes-publicaciones/4408941-situacion-de-la-poblacion-peruana-al-2023-una-mirada-hacia-los-jovenes.

Pan, R., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012). World citation and collaboration networks: Uncovering the role of geography in science. Scientific Reports, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00902.

Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología - Iberoamericana e Interamericana [RICYT] (2024). Gastos en investigación y desarrollo por tipo de financiación. https://app.ricyt.org/ui/v3/comparative.html?indicator=GASIDTIPER&start_year=2012&end_year=2021#chartitle.

Sonnenwald, D. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 643 - 681. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121.

Vlasyuk, T. (2023). Efficiency analysis of using the scientific potential in the Ukrainian higher education system. Management, 36(2), 9 - 24. https://doi.org/10.30857/2415-3206.2022.2.1.

Wagner, C., Whetsell, T., Baas, J., & Jonkers, K. (2018). Openness and impact of leading scientific countries. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00010.

World Intellectual Property Organization [WIPO] (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022: What is the future of innovation-driven growth? () Editorial: WIPO. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.46596.