El uso de aplicaciones de inteligencia artificial para la educación e investigación científica
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
La Inteligencia Artificial (IA), particularmente las herramientas de Inteligencia Artificial Generativa (IAG), se están utilizando cada vez más en el campo de la educación y la investigación. Este artículo explora el uso de aplicaciones de IA, como ChatGPT, Scite y Litmaps, en la educación y la investigación científica, los cuales ofrecen varias ventajas; sin embargo, su uso debe realizarse con precaución. Se debe verificar cualquier inferencia realizada por las herramientas de IA existentes, para garantizar su validez. Aunque las tecnologías actuales de IA pueden proporcionar análisis y representación de redes de citas, sus resultados pueden estar influenciados por la calidad y exhaustividad de las bases de datos en diversos campos. es importante que expertos humanos revisen y verifiquen con cuidado las referencias. Además, las instituciones académicas deben educar a estudiantes e investigadores sobre los riesgos éticos asociados con el uso de modelos de IAG, al tiempo que proporcionan pautas para prevenir el plagio.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Citas
Arif, T., Munaf, U., & Ul-Haque, I. (2023). The future of medical education and research: Is ChatGPT a blessing or blight in disguise? Medical Education Online, 28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2181052.
Bard, Google AI. (2023). Bard. https://bard.google.com/.
Barrot, J. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.1007.
Brody, S. (2021). Scite. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(4), 707–710. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.1331.
Buriak, J., Akinwande, D., Artzi, N., Brinker, C., Burrows, C., Chan, W., Chen, C., Chen, X., Chhowalla, M., Chi, L., Chueh, W., Crudden, C., Carlo, D., Glotzer, S., Hersam, M., Ho, D., Hu, T., Huang, J., Javey, A., Kamat PV, Kim ID, Kotov NA, Lee TR, Lee YH, Li Y, Liz-Marzán LM, Mulvaney P, Narang P, Nordlander P, Oklu R, Parak WJ, Rogach AL, Salanne M, Samorì P, Schaak RE, Schanze KS, Sekitani T, Skrabalak S, Sood AK, Voets IK, Wang S, Wang S, Wee ATS, Ye J. (2023). Best Practices for Using AI When Writing Scientific Manuscripts. American Chemical Society,17(5):4091-4093. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c01544.
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. Institute of Electrical and Electronics, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510.
Chen, S., Kann, B., Foote, M., Aerts, H., Savova, G., Mak, R., & Bitterman, D. (2023). The utility of ChatGPT for cancer treatment information. Journal of Medical Internet Research., 25, e48568. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.16.23287316.
Chen, T. (2023). ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 86(4), 351–353. https://doi.org/10.1097/jcma.0000000000000900.
Cheng, K., Li, Z., He, Y., Guo, Q., Lu, Y., Gu, S., & Wu, H. (2023). Potential use of artificial intelligence in infectious disease: Take ChatGPT as an example. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 51, 1130–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03203-3.
Deng, J., & Lin, Y. (2023). The benefits and challenges of chatgpt: An overview. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2, 81–83. https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v2i2.4465.
Firaina, R., & Sulisworo, D. (2023). Exploring the usage of ChatGPT in higher education: Frequency and impact on productivity. Buletin Edukasi Indonesia, 2, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.56741/bei.v2i01.310.
Ghafoor, S., & Yahya, A. (2023). Assessing ChatGPT’s Performance in Answering Cervical Cancer Screening Questions to ChatGPT-generated Clinical Vignettes: A Pilot Study. Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3152561/v1.
Khalil, M., & Er, E. (2023). Will ChatGPT get you caught? rethinking of plagiarism detection. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/fnh48.
Lin, Z. (2023). Why and how to embrace ai such as ChatGPT in your academic life. Royal Society Open Science, 10(8), 230658. https://doi. org/10.31234/osf.io/sdx3j
Liu, Y., Han, T., Ma, S., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Tian, J., He, H., Li, A., He, M., Liu, Z., Wu, Z., Zhao, L., Zhu, D., Li, X., Qiang, N., Shen, D., Liu, T., & Ge, B. (2023). Summary of ChatGPT-Related research and perspective towards the future of large language models. Meta-Radiology,1(2),100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100017.
Mabić, M., Gašpar, D., & Praničević, D. (2022). Does information technology influence processes at universities? – teacher’s perspective. ENTRENOVA – ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 8, 146–153. https://doi.org/10.54820/entrenova-2022-0014.
McCarthy, J. (2007). What is artificial intelligence? https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai.pdf.
Mohammadzadeh, Z., Ausloos, M., & Saeidnia, H. (2023). ChatGPT: High-tech plagiarism awaits academic publishing green light. Non-Fungible Token (NFT) can be a way out. Library Hi Tech News. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-04-2023-0067.
Moorhouse, B., Yeo, M., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151.
Nicholson, J., Mordaunt, M., Lopez, P., Uppala, A., Rosati, D., Rodrigues, N., Grabitz, P., & Rife, S. (2021). Scite: A smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(3), 882–898. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00146.
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT-3.5: Language Model by OpenAI. https://platform.openai.com/docs/models.
Pavlik, J. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator. 78(1), 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577.
Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., & Sutskever, I. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pretraining. OpenAI. https://openai.com/research/language-unsupervised.
Rahman, M., Terano, H., Rahman, N., Salamzadeh, A., Rahaman, M. (2023). ChatGPT and academic research: A review and recommendations based on practical examples. Journal of Education Management and Development Studies, 3, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v3i1.175.
Rahman, M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9). https:// doi.org/10.3390/app13095783.
Russell Group. (2023). Russell group principles on the use of Generative AI tools in education. https://russellgroup.ac.uk/media/6137/rg_ai_principles-final.pdf.
Sallam, M. (2023a). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11, 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887.
Sallam, M. (2023b). The utility of ChatGPT as an example of large language models in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the future perspectives and potential limitations. MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.19.23286155.
Sallam, M., Salim, N., Barakat, M., & Al-Tammemi, A. (2023). ChatGPT Applications in Medical, Dental, Pharmacy, and Public Health Education: A Descriptive Study Highlighting the Advantages and Limitations. Narra J, 3 (1), e103. https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v3i1.103.
Seth, I., Kenney, P., Bulloch, G., Hunter-Smith, D., Thomsen, J., & Rozen, W. (2023). Artificial or Augmented Authorship? A Conversation with a Chatbot on Base of Thumb Arthritis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 11(5), e4999 https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000004999.
Strong, E., DiGiammarino, A., Weng, Y., Basaviah, P., Hosamani, P., Kumar, A., Nevins, A., Kugler, J., Hom, J., & Chen, J. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on free-response, clinical reasoning exams. JAMA Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.24.23287731.
Sütcüoğlu, B., & Güler, M. (2023). Appropriateness of premature ovarian insufficiency recommendations provided by ChatGPT. Menopause, 30(10), 1033–1037. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002246.
World Economic Forum. (2023). The Future of Jobs report 2023, insight report may 2023. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2023.pdf.