The use of artificial intelligence applications for education and scientific research

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 7, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.57107/hyw.v3i1.61
Keywords:
artificial intelligence apps ChatGPT Scite Litmaps research

Main Article Content

José Segovia Juárez
Universidad Tecnológica de los Andes. Abancay. Perú
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-5886
Robert Baumgartner
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima. Perú
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4354-3843

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI), is increasingly being used in education and scientific research. This article explores the use of AI applications, such as ChatGPT, Scite, and Litmaps in education and scientific research. This kind of application offers several advantages but should be used with certain caution. Any inference must be verified made by AI tools to ensure their validity. While current AI technologies can quickly analyze vast amounts of data or represent networks of citations, their results may be influenced by the quality and comprehensiveness of databases. Thus, human experts must review and verify the results carefully to ensure their accuracy and originality. Additionally, academic institutions should educate students and researchers about the risks of utilizing GAI models while providing comprehensive guidelines to prevent plagiarism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Segovia Juárez, J., & Baumgartner, R. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence applications for education and scientific research. Revista De Investigación Hatun Yachay Wasi, 3(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.57107/hyw.v3i1.61
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024)
Section
Artículos
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Arif, T., Munaf, U., & Ul-Haque, I. (2023). The future of medical education and research: Is ChatGPT a blessing or blight in disguise? Medical Education Online, 28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2181052.

Bard, Google AI. (2023). Bard. https://bard.google.com/.

Barrot, J. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.1007.

Brody, S. (2021). Scite. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(4), 707–710. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.1331.

Buriak, J., Akinwande, D., Artzi, N., Brinker, C., Burrows, C., Chan, W., Chen, C., Chen, X., Chhowalla, M., Chi, L., Chueh, W., Crudden, C., Carlo, D., Glotzer, S., Hersam, M., Ho, D., Hu, T., Huang, J., Javey, A., Kamat PV, Kim ID, Kotov NA, Lee TR, Lee YH, Li Y, Liz-Marzán LM, Mulvaney P, Narang P, Nordlander P, Oklu R, Parak WJ, Rogach AL, Salanne M, Samorì P, Schaak RE, Schanze KS, Sekitani T, Skrabalak S, Sood AK, Voets IK, Wang S, Wang S, Wee ATS, Ye J. (2023). Best Practices for Using AI When Writing Scientific Manuscripts. American Chemical Society,17(5):4091-4093. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c01544.

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. Institute of Electrical and Electronics, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510.

Chen, S., Kann, B., Foote, M., Aerts, H., Savova, G., Mak, R., & Bitterman, D. (2023). The utility of ChatGPT for cancer treatment information. Journal of Medical Internet Research., 25, e48568. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.16.23287316.

Chen, T. (2023). ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 86(4), 351–353. https://doi.org/10.1097/jcma.0000000000000900.

Cheng, K., Li, Z., He, Y., Guo, Q., Lu, Y., Gu, S., & Wu, H. (2023). Potential use of artificial intelligence in infectious disease: Take ChatGPT as an example. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 51, 1130–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03203-3.

Deng, J., & Lin, Y. (2023). The benefits and challenges of chatgpt: An overview. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2, 81–83. https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v2i2.4465.

Firaina, R., & Sulisworo, D. (2023). Exploring the usage of ChatGPT in higher education: Frequency and impact on productivity. Buletin Edukasi Indonesia, 2, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.56741/bei.v2i01.310.

Ghafoor, S., & Yahya, A. (2023). Assessing ChatGPT’s Performance in Answering Cervical Cancer Screening Questions to ChatGPT-generated Clinical Vignettes: A Pilot Study. Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3152561/v1.

Khalil, M., & Er, E. (2023). Will ChatGPT get you caught? rethinking of plagiarism detection. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/fnh48.

Lin, Z. (2023). Why and how to embrace ai such as ChatGPT in your academic life. Royal Society Open Science, 10(8), 230658. https://doi. org/10.31234/osf.io/sdx3j

Liu, Y., Han, T., Ma, S., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Tian, J., He, H., Li, A., He, M., Liu, Z., Wu, Z., Zhao, L., Zhu, D., Li, X., Qiang, N., Shen, D., Liu, T., & Ge, B. (2023). Summary of ChatGPT-Related research and perspective towards the future of large language models. Meta-Radiology,1(2),100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100017.

Mabić, M., Gašpar, D., & Praničević, D. (2022). Does information technology influence processes at universities? – teacher’s perspective. ENTRENOVA – ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 8, 146–153. https://doi.org/10.54820/entrenova-2022-0014.

McCarthy, J. (2007). What is artificial intelligence? https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai.pdf.

Mohammadzadeh, Z., Ausloos, M., & Saeidnia, H. (2023). ChatGPT: High-tech plagiarism awaits academic publishing green light. Non-Fungible Token (NFT) can be a way out. Library Hi Tech News. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-04-2023-0067.

Moorhouse, B., Yeo, M., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151.

Nicholson, J., Mordaunt, M., Lopez, P., Uppala, A., Rosati, D., Rodrigues, N., Grabitz, P., & Rife, S. (2021). Scite: A smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(3), 882–898. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00146.

OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT-3.5: Language Model by OpenAI. https://platform.openai.com/docs/models.

Pavlik, J. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator. 78(1), 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577.

Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., & Sutskever, I. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pretraining. OpenAI. https://openai.com/research/language-unsupervised.

Rahman, M., Terano, H., Rahman, N., Salamzadeh, A., Rahaman, M. (2023). ChatGPT and academic research: A review and recommendations based on practical examples. Journal of Education Management and Development Studies, 3, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v3i1.175.

Rahman, M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9). https:// doi.org/10.3390/app13095783.

Russell Group. (2023). Russell group principles on the use of Generative AI tools in education. https://russellgroup.ac.uk/media/6137/rg_ai_principles-final.pdf.

Sallam, M. (2023a). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11, 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887.

Sallam, M. (2023b). The utility of ChatGPT as an example of large language models in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the future perspectives and potential limitations. MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.19.23286155.

Sallam, M., Salim, N., Barakat, M., & Al-Tammemi, A. (2023). ChatGPT Applications in Medical, Dental, Pharmacy, and Public Health Education: A Descriptive Study Highlighting the Advantages and Limitations. Narra J, 3 (1), e103. https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v3i1.103.

Seth, I., Kenney, P., Bulloch, G., Hunter-Smith, D., Thomsen, J., & Rozen, W. (2023). Artificial or Augmented Authorship? A Conversation with a Chatbot on Base of Thumb Arthritis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 11(5), e4999 https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000004999.

Strong, E., DiGiammarino, A., Weng, Y., Basaviah, P., Hosamani, P., Kumar, A., Nevins, A., Kugler, J., Hom, J., & Chen, J. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on free-response, clinical reasoning exams. JAMA Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.24.23287731.

Sütcüoğlu, B., & Güler, M. (2023). Appropriateness of premature ovarian insufficiency recommendations provided by ChatGPT. Menopause, 30(10), 1033–1037. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002246.

World Economic Forum. (2023). The Future of Jobs report 2023, insight report may 2023. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2023.pdf.